2011 Winter Seasonal Tournament Results
January 2011

Final Standings:

Open Section:

No.NameStRatePts
1ahundov, Ruslan IWI23155.0
2zhou, Jerry ZhexuaWI18843.5
3ayoade, wale EWI17052.5
4Bruch, Robert MWI18642.5
5mckinney, christopherWI18952.5
6Wiedenhoeft, RobertWI18462.5
7pokorski, jeffreyWI17742.0
8etzel, steven WWI15031.5
9hernandez, josephWI15651.5
10harding, russellWI16200.0

Reserve Section:

No.NameStRatePts
1paasch, vinceWI14005.0
2buschmann, alan EWI12773.5
3Koepke, KevinWI 3.0
4najeeb, Hadi SWI12073.0
5najeeb, Yaseen SWI11083.0
6Sproehlich, AnthonyWI13173.0
7kaiser, kurt RaymondWI 2.0
8Wanek, EllenWI 2.0
9kaiser, christianWI 1.0
10kaiser, Carson A BWI 0.0

Final Crosstable:

Open Section:

No.NameRatePtsRnd1Rnd2Rnd3Rnd4Rnd5
1ahundov, Ruslan I23155.0W6W3W2W5W4
2mckinney, christopher18952.5W7W9L1D3L5
3zhou, Jerry Zhexua18843.5W8L1W6D2W7
4Bruch, Robert M18642.5L9W5D7W10L1
5Wiedenhoeft, Robert18462.5D10L4W9L1W2
6pokorski, jeffrey17742.0L1W10L3L7W9
7ayoade, wale E17052.5L2W8D4W6L3
8harding, russell16200.0L3L7-U--U--U-
9hernandez, joseph15651.5W4L2L5-H-L6
10etzel, steven W15031.5D5L6-B-L4-U-

Reserve Section:

No.NameRatePtsRnd1Rnd2Rnd3Rnd4Rnd5
1paasch, vince14005.0W6W10W9W2W4
2Sproehlich, Anthony13173.0L9W6W3L1W10
3buschmann, alan E12773.5-H-W4L2W8W5
4najeeb, Hadi S12073.0W8L3W10W9L1
5najeeb, Yaseen S11083.0-B-L9W8W7L3
6kaiser, Carson A B 0.0L1L2L7L10L8
7kaiser, christian 1.0L10L8W6L5L9
8kaiser, kurt Raymond 2.0L4W7L5L3W6
9Koepke, Kevin 3.0W2W5L1L4W7
10Wanek, Ellen 2.0W7L1L4W6L2

Tournament Champion: Ruslan Ahundov
Reserve Champion: Vince Paasch


Tie-Breaker Information

After this tournament, a player had some questions about the tie-breaker system we use, so I thought as TD it would be a good idea to explain them here.  We follow the USCF tie-breaker guidelines, and I'll use this tournament's Open section results as an example.

Obviously, the standings in a tournament are primarily determined by the number of points a player has scored.  When there are no duplicate scores, there is no need to employ tie-breakers.  In this tournament's Open section, the first and second-place finishers had 5.0 and 3.5 points, respectively, making them the clear first and second places.  But if you look at the next four players, they all had 2.5 points, so tie-breakers need to come into play.

Here is the final standings chart for the Open section, showing the tie-breaker values:

PlaceName/TeamRateScoreMMedSolkCumCumOp
1ahundov, Ruslan I (1)2315 5.0 11.0 13.0 15.0 39.0
2zhou, Jerry Zhexua (3)1884 3.5 12.0 13.5 10.0 37.5
3mckinney, christopher (2)1895 2.5 8.5 15.0 10.0 44.5
4ayoade, wale E (7)1705 2.5 7.0 12.0 7.5 32.5
5Bruch, Robert M (4)1864 2.5 6.5 13.0 7.5 39.0
6Wiedenhoeft, Robert (5)1846 2.5 6.5 13.0 6.5 42.5
7pokorski, jeffrey (6)1774 2.0 9.0 14.0 5.0 42.5
8hernandez, joseph (9)1565 1.5 7.0 9.5 5.5 29.0
9etzel, steven W (10)1503 1.5 4.5 7.0 4.5 19.0
10harding, russell (8)1620 0.0 2.5 6.0 0.0 17.5

There are four tie-breakers in our scheme, applied in the order they appear from left to right:

Modified Median ("MMed") -- The total scores of all the player's opponents, MINUS the lowest.  For Ahundov, who played Zhou (3.5), McKinney (2.5), Bruch (2.5), Wiedenhoeft (2.5) and Pokorski (2.0), this would be 3.5 + 2.5 + 2.5 + 2.5, or 11.0 (the lowest, 2.0, is dropped in this method).

Solkoff ("Solk") -- The total scores of all the player's opponents.  For Ahundov, who played Zhou (3.5), McKinney (2.5), Bruch (2.5), Wiedenhoeft (2.5) and Pokorski (2.0), this would be 3.5 + 2.5 + 2.5 + 2.5 + 2.0, or 13.0.

Cumulative ("Cum") -- The total of the player's scores at the end of each round.  For Ahundov, who had wins in each round, this would be 1.0 + 2.0 + 3.0 + 4.0 + 5.0, or 15.0.

Cumulative of Opponents ("CumOp") -- The total of the opponents' Cumulative scores.  For Ahundov, this would be those of Zhou (10.0), McKinney (10.0), Bruch (7.5), Wiedenhoeft (6.5) and Pokorski (5.0), or 39.0.

So in this situation, the four player with scores of 2.5 have tie-breakers applied in order to determine the standings.  The first tie breaker is the Modified Median, and McKinney's 8.5 here is higher than the next player's, so he takes third place.

Next, Ayoade's Modified Median of 7.0 is higher than the next player's 6.5, putting him clearly in fourth place.

The next two players, Bruch and Wiedenhoeft, have the same Modified Median of 6.5, so we look at the next tie breaker, the Solkoff.  Again, these are the same at 13.0, so we have to look at the third tie-breaker, the Cumulative value.  In this case, Bruch's is higher so he takes fifth place.


BACK to ORCA Tournament Page